Joe Henry: Finding Spirituality in the Sound
The singer-songwriter on tapping his well of inspiration and learning from his son as much as raising him.
Photo by Glen Hansard
As with Leonard Cohen or Tom Waits, the lyrics of Joe Henry stand on their own, like these lines from “Dark Is Light Enough” off his latest album Thrum:
I know fact from fiction, know they are the same / two sides of believing in the singing of God’s name / that knows itself in hunger, the never-ending fight / the kiss that lives between us where the dark keeps all the light.”
But Henry’s music—a distinctive blend of jazz and folk, smoky and pastoral—fits the words perfectly. The band he’s assembled for Thrum includes his son Levon Henry on saxophone, clarinet—and whistling. We talked to the 56-year-old North Carolina native about making Thrum, his upcoming tour and turning his 30-year recording career into a family affair.
Paste: This is by my count your 14th record.
Joe Henry: That’s my count too.
So when the songs of Thrum started coming to you, how did you want to approach this particular batch of songs differently than you have in the past?
“I grew up understanding that a certain attitude of Southern Christianity was my parents’ emotional vocabulary before they understood the world and their place within it. I was invited to adopt that as my own point-of-view as well, but I decided even at a very young age that that’s not how it works for me—that what they got from Christianity was what I got from music.”
You have to understand that for me it’s not so much about having an idea and imposing it. I don’t have a concept as I’m writing and then writing songs that might meet me there. At a certain point I’m writing songs and throwing them onto a pile. At some moment I understand that there’s a number of them that are sharing vocabulary, emotional weather and intention. And when I recognize that there are three, four, five songs that are inter-related in a way—sometimes I can articulate how I think they are and sometimes it’s a more instinctive understanding. And then I kind of listen to what I think they need to thrive. At some point as I’m working and I’m writing the remaining songs I think I need for this complete movie, I just hear in an instant when I hear what I think the record feels and sounds like. It’s like a struck bell, and I understand that I’ve heard it. Then I have to go back and say, “If that’s what this record feels and sounds like, this thing that I’ve heard go off in my head, who needs to be in the room to help me find it and articulate that?” I’m just really listening to the intention of the music, and in the case of Thrum, I just heard that songs needed to be treated, that these weren’t supposed to be high-fidelity documentation of live performances, but these live performances needed things to happen. And I just tried to keep listening until I understood how it worked.
Listening to the album, the lyrics and the sound have a very Wendell Barry feel—you’ve got a lot of imagery of both nature and religion. I know you grew up in a religious home in the South. Did you find those religious concepts creeping into a natural world, or were these really more about the ideas of faith and mercy with lines like ”’salvation’ meaning nothing but consumed’” or “my disappeared redeemer’s lost believer”? Are those elements of religion parts of what the songs are about are you just using those terms to color what the songs are actually about?
That’s a good question. I’m sure the answer is yes to both options you offered me. I was raised by deeply religious people, but they were not the kind of people to browbeat anybody with their faith. I grew up understanding that a certain attitude of Southern Christianity was my parents’ emotional vocabulary before they understood the world and their place within it. I was invited to adopt that as my own point-of-view as well, but I decided even at a very young age that that’s not how it works for me—that what they got from Christianity was what I got from music, which was understanding my relationship to something bigger than I was and something sacred. And sacred, not meaning something precious or limiting, but sacred as things that we honor and devote ourselves to. So, yes, that imagery is part of the vocabulary is what I was taught when I learned to speak in the most fundamental ways as a young person. And I use that imagery to paint whoever I might the same way as using imagery of the natural world. Just by its nature it doesn’t insist that you have this point-of-view versus that one. You use that imagery to speak however you want to. And I use that imagery to say whatever I need to not out of fidelity to any kind of institutional religion of any sort. That’s the lens that I was given to look through. I can still decide where to point my lens. Religious imagery is just like American imagery, just like nature imagery. I come by it honestly; it’s what I grew out of. But it doesn’t contain my thinking, if that makes sense.
It does, absolutely.