The Summer of Steven’s Destructive End

What in the world are we going to do now?
We’ve been massively spoiled by four straight weeks of Steven Universe. Even though Cartoon Network announced that Season Four is going to proceed right out of this “Steven Nuke” on an episode-per-week basis, the past month has been so remarkable that anything else is going foment some serious hunger. Once the episodes stop flowing and the next inevitable hiatus starts, we’re going to have to ruminate on the events of the Summer of Steven for a long time.
“Bubbled,” which aired Wednesday, was the Season Three finale, and HOLY MOLY did it bring things to a new level of intensity. The episodes leading up to it, too…we got a new fusion, the defeat of the Crystal Gems’ most dangerous enemy to date, and some very interesting new information on gem corruption. Certainly, there’s a lot to chew on. Let’s get started.
ROSE SLAYS
Undoubtedly, the week’s biggest plot point—and the climax of the entire Summer of Steven—was the revelation that Rose Quartz shattered Pink Diamond. This should put to rest the major fan theory that Rose was Pink Diamond, unless people are unwilling to believe Garnet’s confirmation of the event (and Garnet has no reason to lie). More importantly, it’s totally flipped the table on Steven; he’s specialized in dealing out hard facts of life this summer, particularly to Amethyst, but now it’s his turn to reckon with an incredibly difficult truth.
If Rose Quartz seemed near-infallible to her son before this, that illusion has been destroyed for good. We learned last week that Steven categorically opposes killing (perhaps a consequence of him growing up in peacetime, without the horrors of war normalized), and even though Garnet claims that shattering Pink Diamond was necessary for the Crystal Gems to win control of Earth, Steven’s worldview requires him to hold that Rose’s action was inherently evil. For a kid who’s just beginning to step into (and in some ways past) his mother’s legacy, whose mother’s consciousness is literally embedded in his belly button, this doesn’t just affect his view of his mother…it affects his own self-concept. Even though the super-empathetic Steven would never kill—in fact, he put himself in grave danger twice this week to help known enemies—he can’t escape the fact that a significant part of his identity put aside that maxim for the sake of Earth and her friends.
In many ways, this scene reminded me of a moment in Avatar: The Last Airbender (Steven’s spiritual predecessor in so many ways). When Aang is riding aboard a giant lion turtle, all his past lives tell him he must kill the evil Fire Lord Ozai. At the last minute, Aang finds an alternative, using skills he learned from the turtle to take away Ozai’s firebending. It’s a solution that preserves the purity of Aang’s soul, keeps him morally consistent and wraps the Avatar saga in a pristine ribbon and bow. Aang, like Steven, is governed by a love of all life, and while he’s more temperamental and more prone to go on the offensive in combat, his empathy always wins the day. It would make narrative sense for Steven, if put in a similar situation to that of Aang, to find a way to win without shattering any of the Diamonds. In a single stroke, he would both live up to his mother by winning her war and move beyond her by refusing to violate his core values.
What’s fascinating, though, and what gives me pause in making the above prediction, is the show’s presentation of Rose’s act as self-sacrifice. “She didn’t always do what was best for her,” Garnet says, “but she always did what was best for Earth.” Ordinarily, self-sacrifice—especially in the oft-simpler morality of all-ages entertainment, and especially in the Judeo-Christian tradition in which Western culture is rooted—involves a character giving up life or something of similar value to save others. Righteous warriors garner admiration, but icon status is reserved for the martyrs, and the martyrs are always figures of peace by the time they die. In “Bubbled,” though, Steven Universe forces us to consider moral sacrifice on par with other forms of martyrdom, an act just as damaging and, so long as it’s righteous, just as admirable as walking willingly into death’s arms.
This view is borne out when we look at PTSD, a devastating syndrome among veterans everywhere that affects the killers just as horribly as the wounded. It’s the reason there’s mandatory briefing for police officers who fire their weapons in the line of duty (regardless of whether said officer has acted righteously or committed homicide). So long as combatants enter a war with a system of morality that values others’ lives, killing an enemy is a painful emotional price to pay in the name of defending one’s people and values. And seeing as Rose poofed Bismuth over the prospect of using the Breaking Point, we have to conclude that shattering Pink Diamond is a burden she carried with her for thousands of years.
What if Steven’s growth involves him realizing that sometimes moral sacrifice is necessary to protect the ones we love? What if, when he faces the Diamonds (you know it’s going to happen), a non-lethal solution proves impossible, and one of the Crystal Gems has to shatter a Diamond to ensure their survival? Would Steven do it, and bear that burden, to spare his friends the emotional pain? I can’t imagine a more empathetic action. We’ve already seen that some characters in Steven Universe are beyond saving. Having the show’s protagonist commit a righteous kill to save everyone he loves would be an unprecedented, hyper-realistic, incredibly bold step for a kids’ television show. I still don’t expect this to happen, but if anyone could pull off that story, it would be Rebecca Sugar and company.
HOW TO LOSE A MIND IN TEN SECONDS