The Terror Succeeds as an Anthology Because It Understands Humans Can Be Worse Than Monsters
Photo Courtesy of AMC
On the surface, AMC’s The Terror seems like something of an odd choice for an anthology series. Based on a best-selling novel by Dan Simmons, the series’ first season was a tense, claustrophobic story of creeping dread set in a very specific time and place. (With soul-destroying cold to go with it.) It was also a tale with a very definitive ending, and one that made little effort to expand into the sort of narrative world building that might naturally lead to a second run.
Yet, despite the fact that The Terror’s second season, Infamy, is set in a later historical period and embraces a very different style of horror than its predecessor did, the two share a thematic bond; one that makes the series feel much richer and more connected than if it had simply tried to make a sequel to its original tale. The Terror succeeds precisely because it’s so good at infusing specific places and time periods with universal questions and themes, while using horror as a lens to explore the worst aspects of the real world we all know.
Infamy is set in the Japanese interment camps of the 1940s, as U.S. citizens turn on and imprison their own countrymen in the name of security and national pride. This historical backdrop is so harrowing that it hardly needs supernatural elements to be terrifying, and the addition of ghosts to the story does more to illuminate the flaws of the humans involved than anything else. There are no jump scares for shock value or faceless killers lurking in shadows with hooks for hands here. Instead, the show uses its supernaturally-tinged setting to explore the darker issues of human psychology, including the apparently limitless evil that our species is willing to inflict upon one another. Though The Terror’s first two seasons include bloodthirsty creatures and vengeful ghosts, the true monsters at the heart of these tales wear much more familiar faces: they look a lot like us.
Season One told the (true) story of the doomed Franklin Expedition, two British ships that disappeared on a quest to find the Northwest Passage in the mid-nineteenth century. The series explores what might have happened to them in grisly and often terrifying detail, as the men of the H.M.S. Erebus and H.M.S. Terror fall victim to everything from lead poisoning and paranoia to starvation and a bloodthirsty supernatural polar bear. But although the crew is ostensibly united against the mysterious and malevolent Tuunbaq, what ultimately brings them to their knees are their own weak and treacherous natures. The men mutiny, murder, and betray one another. Some ultimately turn to cannibalism as their struggle for survival becomes more and more desperate. By the end of their journey, the Tunbaaq is the least of the crew’s problems, and the supernatural element is the least compelling aspect of the show.
The Terror: Infamy tackles a completely different sort of narrative in terms of time period, setting and supernatural creatures involved than the series’ first season did. But at its heart, one very important thing remains the same: Whatever the monsters in this tale may be, they’re not—and have never been—the point of this story.
Season Two follows the Japanese-American residents of Southern California’s Terminal Island, rounded up in the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor attack and forced to live in detention camps up and down the West Coast by order of the federal government. Infamy largely focuses on the Nakayamas, a family comprised of traditionalist father Henry, modern son Chester and peacekeeper mother Asako. The tensions within this family generally mirror the tensions within the Japanese-American experience at large, as these immigrants find themselves both punished for trying too hard to adopt American customs and looked down upon for silo-ing themselves among members of the culture they left behind.