WWE Needs a Women’s Royal Rumble
Photos courtesy WWE.com
This weekend’s Royal Rumble pay-per-view features three women’s matches, which is nothing to sneeze at. But many fans were hoping the first stop on the road to WrestleMania would be marked by an inaugural women’s Royal Rumble match.
It’s not the only time WWE has dropped the ball in the wake of the “women’s revolution”: both Raw and SmackDown lacked even one women’s match this past week, and last June’s Money in the Bank sorely missed a titular match featuring the women’s division. With the recent addition of women’s cage matches and the occasional main event, it seemed like a no-brainer that women would get a Rumble match this year.
Naysayers might assert that the women’s roster is too thin to warrant even a 20-woman Rumble, but to that I raise you Bayley, Sasha Banks, Nia Jax, Dana Brooke, Alicia Fox, Nikki Bella, Natalya, Carmella, Naomi, Becky Lynch and Mickie James. Lana and Maryse could make appearances, the return of Eva Marie would draw heat, and the Royal Rumble is an obvious venue for the much-awaited re-debut of Emmalina. Speaking of debuts, the competition Asuka has been craving in NXT can certainly be found on the main roster—imagine new feuds with Charlotte and Banks, or revisiting her old foes Bayley and Jax—while fellow NXT talents Aliyah, Liv Morgan and occasional wrestler Deonna Purrazzo wouldn’t be out of place having already had main roster dalliances. Add in Billie Kay, Peyton Royce, Ember Moon or Nikki Cross, or even a veteran like Lita for a one-time appearance, and there’s your 20-woman Rumble.