6.0

Went Up the Hill Is an Emotionally Powerful but Ponderous Queer Ghost Story

Went Up the Hill Is an Emotionally Powerful but Ponderous Queer Ghost Story
Introducing Endless Mode: A New Games & Anime Site from Paste
Listen to this article

It’s a fine line that exists between atmosphere and cinematic torpor. Elements such as darkness, stillness, silence and coldness can evoke the desired sense of suffocation that characters are experiencing during a period of extreme grief, confusion and loss of identity … but at some point, a concession must also be made toward keeping the audience engaged in the story that is playing out. Evoking misery is one thing; making the viewer slog through it in order to progress a simple story is another. In this way, the push-pull between effective emotional evocation and a grinding loss of narrative momentum forms the crux of the difficult-to-assess Went Up the Hill, the sophomore feature from New Zealand director Samuel Van Grinsven. A queer ghost story with devastating emotional power and transgressive themes of domination, selfishness and abandonment, it is all too often hamstrung by plodding stylistic choices and a thin script that stretches many of its interactions until they’re so thin, threadbare and ethereal that they end up just as spectral.

That Went Up the Hill revolves almost entirely (visibly, at least) around two characters named “Jack” and “Jill” is something of an oddly cute-seeming choice, given the dreary, entirely serious and morose screenplay from Grinsven and co-writer Jory Anast. We’ll give you two guesses as to whether Jack ultimately falls down and breaks his crown, in a manner of speaking, but suffice to say, the film centers itself around two characters sharing the same loss in vastly different ways, and reckoning with the psychic scars that abuse has left behind, mingled with toxic attraction and emotional dependency.

Jack (Dacre Montgomery) is a young gay man out of place, arriving at the remote funeral of Elizabeth, the mother he barely ever knew. Given up for adoption as a young child, for reasons he has never understood, Jack is surprised to be invited to the funeral by Elizabeth’s widow Jill (Vicky Krieps), only to be confronted with an odd reality upon arriving: Jill has no memory of inviting him, nor was Jill ever actually aware of Jack’s existence until now. It’s our first hint at the mechanic that Went Up the Hill will entirely revolve around, which is spiritual possession.

In a more traditional psychological horror yarn, this thought of possession would be portrayed with a great deal of uncertainty and ambivalence on the part of the filmmaker. Consider, for instance, Jack Clayton’s essential 1961 gothic horror classic The Innocents, where the question from start to finish is how much of what Deborah Kerr’s Miss Giddens is experiencing is real, or in her mind. Is the young Miles truly being possessed by the spirit of the home’s lecherous former groundskeeper, or is Miss Giddens irreparably damaging the boy in her attempt to ferret out spiritual corruption where it doesn’t exist, driven by her own deteriorating mental state?

Went Up the Hill does not deal in that kind of uncertainty: We are shown in no uncertain terms that not only is the spirit of Elizabeth still present in the cold, unforgiving, cement-slabbed, mausoleum-like modern home she designed as an award-winning architect, but that this spirit has the ability to enter into both Jack and Jill’s bodies on a nightly basis, effectively allowing each of them to commune with her as an otherworldly triptych. We’re not meant to question whether any of it is in fact happening; Went Up the Hill is instead about teasing out threads of the complex web of desires and emotions present between these three.

Jack, unsurprisingly, is driven to face his abandonment issues, desiring to know why Elizabeth sent him away as a child. Montgomery has the look of a kicked puppy throughout, though at his best the wounded tenderness recalls the likes of Lee Pace. Jill is feeling much the same, reeling from a different form of abandonment after Elizabeth (who had suffered from a long, undisclosed illness) completed suicide by walking into the frozen lake behind their mountain abode with pockets filled with stones to drag her down. Elizabeth, speaking through Jack, answers Jill’s questions with bleak straightforwardness that broaches terrifying metaphysical realities: She says she killed herself seeking an end to pain, but instead found that “Nothing stopped. The pain just … followed.” It’s a chilling thought, to suggest that the afterlife involves not release from our burdens, but simply a new platform for the same suffering. When asked where Elizabeth is when she’s not possessing either Jill or Jack, her one-word reply is all the more unsettling: “Alone.”

Perhaps it’s understandable, then, that Elizabeth now seeks some other form of life, or sensation, through possession of the still-alive Jack and Jill, but her lack of concern for their autonomy and her willingness to greedily exploit their complex feelings for her speaks to the supremely selfish, domineering person that Elizabeth also apparently was in life. While living, she hurt both Jack and Jill, abuse veiled behind her persona as a brilliant artist and designer, twisting Jill’s love in particular into dependency, leaving her questioning whether she could function without Elizabeth. “I thought if I let her hurt me, she wouldn’t hurt herself,” admits Jill to Jack during one of their many, breathy, whispered conversations, speaking to each other by day as if they’re afraid of Elizabeth eavesdropping from the Other Side. Jack, learning of the early childhood abuse that no doubt left an emotional wound on him whether or not he remembers it, poisoning his own ability to effectively operate within a relationship, is encouraged to leave by Elizabeth’s still-living, estranged sister Helen (a scene-stealing Sarah Peirse), as she argues that he was sent away to spare him life in Elizabeth’s orbit. “You deserve better than us,” she says. “Better than our family.”

These interactions can be powerful, and transgressive, particularly in one supremely disturbing instance of sexual aggression between a possessed Jack and Jill, which is unnerving on numerous, incestuous levels. But for each moment steeped in tension or heart-rending recrimination, there are two moments where it feels as if Van Grinsven’s film is frozen in place like Elizabeth’s rock-laden body at the bottom of that lake. Each curt, whispered, difficult to parse piece of dialogue (subtitles are nearly mandatory) is surrounded by oceans of pregnant pause and silence. The “rules,” what little there are, about how the possession occurs and how Jack and Jill are meant to dispel it by “letting go” of their attachment to Elizabeth, are extremely unclear, up to each viewer to infer almost totally for themselves. Ten minutes could be trimmed by simply reducing the indulgent expanses of the film’s negative space; cutting 20 would be a distinct possibility. There’s barely enough story to support any sense of forward momentum, and adjectives like “meditative” can become “interminable” with alacrity that would be foreign to Went Up the Hill.

That’s a shame, given many of the handsome aesthetic strengths that the film does possess. Visually, it plays with elements such as intense changes in focus/depth of field from shot to shot, mirroring the disorienting fog through which Jack and Jill find themselves swimming. It’s aurally haunting as well, with an unsettling score from Hanan Townshend that mimics human moaning and wailing to the point that it’s not always entirely clear whether what we’re hearing is conceptual or diegetic. But it’s just not enough to make Went Up the Hill work as much more than a mood piece–an engrossing piece of genre fiction this certainly isn’t, not that it particularly intends to be. The flashes of what could have been, however, haunt Van Grinsven’s ghost story with unrealized possibility. Is it “unfinished business?” Or is it just unfinished?

Director: Samuel Van Grinsven
Writers: Samuel Van Grinsven, Jory Anast
Stars: Dacre Montgomery, Vicky Krieps, Sarah Peirse
Release date: Aug. 14, 2025


Jim Vorel is Paste’s Movies editor and resident genre geek. You can follow him on Twitter or on Bluesky for more film writing.

 
Join the discussion...