The Rob Porter Fiasco Continues to Breed Division Within the White House
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty
The shockwaves emanating through the White House after the revelation that former staff secretary Rob Porter had been accused of domestic abuse by two ex-wives continued through the weekend and exposed an administration divided, despite attempts to present a unified front.
Much of the focus following Porter’s departure centers around White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, who actively defended Porter publicly after the accusations were revealed last week. Privately, Kelly told Porter that he needed to resign on Wednesday evening, but Porter said he was asked to not resign and fight the charges by a group of White House officials that included Kelly. When photographs of Porter’s ex-wives emerged, further incriminating the former senior aide, Kelly, according to the New York Times, was persuaded to issue a second statement expressing shock. On Friday, Kelly said he would be willing to resign if that was the president’s desire, but no resignation was offered or drafted.
President Trump scrambled various aides to make media appearances over the weekend, attempting to quell doubts about his confidence in and frustration with Kelly. Kellyanne Conway appeared on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, telling host Jake Tapper, “I told [President Trump] I would be with you today. And he said, ‘Please tell Jake that I have full faith in Chief of Staff John Kelly and that I’m not actively searching for replacements … I have faith in him.’”
Conway’s relayed statement comes as Trump informally identified White House budget director Mick Mulvaney and Rep. Kevin McCarthy as possible replacements for Kelly should he resign or be forced out. Mulvaney refuted any interest in Kelly’s job during an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. “I don’t want that job … I love the job—jobs—that I have now,” said Mulvaney, who also heads the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Mulvaney also defended the White House’s handling of the situation, claiming that giving “the benefit of the doubt” to a colleague until more evidence was revealed was perfectly normal. “That’s what the president did up until the time that it became obvious, when the photographs came out, that the person was not being honest with the president,” said Mulvaney.
The problem with giving Porter the benefit of the doubt, however, was that the White House was briefed well in advance of last week that spousal abuse allegations had been lodged against him and they chose not to further investigate themselves.