Weird Science: Sexual Afterglow Lasts Over 48 Hours and A Badger Buries A Cow

This Week in Weird Science: We learn that even science books have become political fodder, with both democrats and republicans seeking completely different types of scientific texts—likely those that support their pre-existing opinions. The only similar science selections are “dinosaur books”—i.e. books for their children. Next, we learn that “sexual afterglow” lasts 48-hours, indicating that everyone knows you just got laid—thus adding meaning to “you’re glowing.” Finally, we watch a badger bury a cow.
You can definitely judge a person by their book cover.
Americans’ political echo chambers extends far beyond the friendships they form, news they consume, and TV shows they watch. It also delves into the science texts they read.
An analysis of book sales, out of the University of Chicago, Yale, and Cornell universities indicates that the divisiveness of politics in the U.S. has spread to the science community, potentially harming the role of scientific literature as a “politically neutral” medium.
“We conclude that the political left and right share an interest in science in general, but not science in particular,” said co-authors James Evans and Michael Macy in the study. “This underscores the need for research into remedies that can attenuate selective exposure to ‘convenient truth,’ renew the capacity for science to inform political debate and temper partisan passions.”
The team of researchers examined purchase histories from two of the world’s largest online book sellers—Amazon and Barnes & Noble—and constructed a database built from “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought” recommendations. From there, they analyzed the scientific purchases of readers who purchased the initial “liberal” or “conservative” book.
They found: People who purchase liberal political books also tended to purchase books on “basic sciences” like physics and astronomy; whereas buyers of conservative political literature preferred books on “applied sciences” like criminology and geophysics. Furthermore, left-leaning buyers tended to make their purchases with other science books of the same discipline. Quite different from conservatives whose science choices coincided with their political choices.
The authors speculate that people who buy political books, no matter their lean, tend to purchase scientific texts not necessarily because of their interest in the subject but because of a political interest the science addresses.
How can this be prevented in the future? According to the author’s, more people need to be interested in science for science’s sake—not using it to reaffirm some belief.
So what can Democrats and Republicans agree on? Well, both read the same dinosaur books on the same dinosaur topics. Let’s hope that book’s not Danny and the Dinosaur.