Mr. Turner

If the typical biopic diminishes the complexity of its subject’s life by chronicling it straightforwardly, Mr. Turner is exceptional for all the mystery it retains. Writer-director Mike Leigh’s latest features the kitchen-sink realism of his best films (Secrets & Lies, Vera Drake), but as with his most recent work (Happy-Go-Lucky, Another Year), Mr. Turner also reaches for something deeper—almost ineffable—about existence that’s as poignant as it is wonderfully hard to pin down.
A longtime passion project finally seeing the light of day, this portrait of acclaimed 19th century British artist J.M.W. Turner flunks all the supposed tenets of the cinematic biopic. It doesn’t make a case for the painter’s legacy, nor does it labor diligently to “explain” his essence. Instead, Mr. Turner is merely a stunning encapsulation of a life, in the process effortlessly hitting upon universal themes of creativity, mortality, love and our lasting worth on a planet that will keep spinning long after we’re gone.
Wanting to make a movie about Turner for about two decades, Leigh didn’t spend that time worrying about solving the riddle of a painter whose emotional, evocative landscapes paved the way for the later Impressionists. Remembered as a volatile, cantankerous curmudgeon, Turner lends himself to a cinematic treatment. (He’s an artistic genius but a deeply flawed human being.) But one of Mr. Turner’s many remarkable qualities is how little Leigh cares about that familiar personality dichotomy. The Turner we see onscreen has many failings, but the movie doesn’t pit his merits and weaknesses against one another. Mr. Turner is neither scandalized nor wowed by his contradictions; the film accepts this man in full. Leigh’s two-and-a-half-hour film has more pressing concerns.
Turner is played magnificently by Timothy Spall, a frequent Leigh collaborator. Grunting, shuffling down the street like a slow-motion cannonball, Spall does nothing to deemphasize Turner’s un-cuddly temperament. (At one point in the film, Turner confesses that he hates looking into the mirror since all he sees staring back is a gargoyle. With his bad teeth and piercing, rat-like gaze, he’s not exaggerating much.) Like Leigh, Spall illuminates Turner by reinforcing his unknowability: This is a performance that’s both profoundly human and inscrutable, keeping us at a distance, always wondering what’s going on behind the man’s eyes.
Not surprisingly, then, Mr. Turner doesn’t have a plot as much as it has a series of incidents that, collectively, sum up a soul. Charting roughly 25 years in Turner’s life, leading up to his death in 1851, the film eschews the “ah-ha” moments of creative inspiration we often get in biopics. Instead, we see Turner after he’s already established himself as one of London’s most admired and popular painters. Nothing he does in Mr. Turner is totemic: He works on paintings; he callously disregards the affections of his long-suffering housekeeper Hannah (Dorothy Atkinson)—that is, unless he’s in need of a quick screw; he inexplicably ignores an ex-lover (Ruth Sheen) who bore him two children, whom he also refuses to acknowledge; he socializes with his fellow painters, including one, Benjamin Haydon (Martin Savage), who has fallen out of favor with the Royal Academy; he loses someone close to him; he ends up finding love.