David Wain on Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp
Main photo by Larry Busacca / Getty ImagesIf it feels like you can’t look at the internet without seeing something about Wet Hot American Summer right now, that’s because the new prequel series First Day of Camp came out on Netflix today. The eight episode miniseries is a long, loving return to the gleeful absurdity of the movie, which failed at the box office in 2001 but forged an enduring bond with a devoted fanbase. A big part of the movie’s mystique is how many of its actors went on to become big stars over the last 15 years, including Bradley Cooper, Amy Poehler, Paul Rudd and Elizabeth Banks. For comedy fans, though, it stands out as the first film from director and co-writer David Wain, the former member of The State who went on to direct Role Models and They Came Together and co-develop Childrens Hospital. We recently talked to Wain about the new series, working with Netflix and Wet Hot American Summer’s amazing cast. And if you want to read our reviews of Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp, you can find a season overview here and the first of our episodic reviews here.
Paste: How did it wind up on Netflix? And as a series, instead of another movie?
David Wain: We had always thought about doing some kind of follow-up to the film and we were always excited about bringing the group back together. The first thought was to do another feature, but as we started developing this prequel story we realized pretty quickly that we had a lot more characters and material that we wanted to get into than we had time for with a feature film. As we looked around we realized there’s this other new emerging medium, the Netflix show, which is for my money kind of the best of both worlds between movie and TV in almost every way. So we started thinking about it in that way and it’s been a real great experience to do it that way.
Paste: When I was watching it it definitely felt kind of like a movie that was chopped up into episodes, and not a regular TV show. It felt like the first season of Eastbound & Down in that way, where it just seamlessly flows into every episode and if you cut out the credits you could maybe just watch it straight through. When you were writing it were you intentionally structuring it that way?
DW: We were trying to do it so it hopefully works on both levels. We know that people do watch Netflix shows all at once so we wanted to make sure that we weren’t endlessly recapping and make it work as a binge-watch. But we also simultaneously wanted to make it work as something you can watch more traditionally. So we tried to give each episode it’s own internal arc as well as following the on-going story.
Paste: It’s also more of an actual prequel than I expected, giving an actual backstory to various characters and scenarios from the film. Why did you want to head in that direction?
DW: Part of the formula of the first film in a way was to take this silly material more seriously than it warranted, and we’ve kind of continued that in the prequel. Treat these characters as if it was the great story of our time. We also just had a lot of fun working backwards from the original movie and it was really inspirational to connect with these stories that we know have to end.
Paste: I’m assuming none of those backstories were in your head when you wrote the movie.
DW: Not really. It’s a lot of, as they call it, “ret-con.” I would be psyched to see so many of these storylines have their own spin-offs. We really were squeezing in whatever we could and throwing out all these other directions we were excited about just to fit it into four hours.
Paste: You mentioned the idea of taking this silliness very seriously. Did you have any ideas or jokes that were too silly or absurd to make it into the show?
DW: Not really. Obviously when you’re making something like this you’re constantly writing things and cutting them. For every joke that’s in there we wrote 20. It’s just the nature of writing it. But in terms of too silly or too absurd, I don’t think that’s the metric. It’s more just what feels right for that scene. There are always things that we cut out because they seem extraneous or unnecessary or breaking a tone. Sometimes I think there’s a perception that what we do is totally anarchic and non-sequitur and just thrown in anything and there are no rules, but in fact it’s really quite the obvious. It’s very structured. We have a lot of rules and a lot of form that we follow and then we break it very deliberately and specifically at certain moments.