Paul F. Tompkins Takes on the Media With No, You Shut Up!

Paul F. Tompkins is a man of many hats, but as I meet him backstage at the Riot LA comedy festival, he happens to be wearing a dapper bowler. Tompkins is a legendary comedian who you’ll recognize from comedy classics Mr. Show With Bob And David, Comedy Bang! Bang!, and the current Netflix hit Bojack Horseman. He’s also a podcasting champ, running the successful Spontaneanation show in his spare time. He’s also the host of No, You Shut Up!, a political talk show that features talking puppets and some seriously impressive guests, and whose fourth season premiered last week on Fusion. [These reasons to watch No, You Shut Up! are from last year, but still valid.—Ed.] He graciously sat down with me to discuss politics, journalism and dismantling traditional television structures.
Paste: Before I watched No, You Shut Up! I expected it to be a typical comedy talk show, but I realized it was more about making fun of the social conventions of those types of shows. Where does that idea come from?
Paul F. Tompkins: The basic tenet of satire is you’re taking on the high and the mighty and you’re trying to stick a pin in these self-important people, the people that have the power. You come to realize that the media has so much power and it’s a big question as to how responsibly they are using that power. A constant thing for us in the modern landscape is how desperate everyone is for viral content and how they want all this digital stuff to succeed and it is a mandate for us to do well digitally and make all this digital content. It just started creeping into what we were doing to make fun of the desperation that everyone has to succeed somehow in the digital world. That became a real runner for us.
The most hubristic thing in modern media is the directive to make a viral video. It’s like your aunt saying that, you know what I mean? It’s impossible to do that. And the idea of trying to predict what’s going to be viral—“if we have these elements, that has a lot of virality to it!”—we wanted to get out ahead of the idea of how sad that is. To be like, “we’re going to make a viral video here! This is going to go so viral! We’re going to get so many hits!” That is never far from our thoughts.
Paste: Did you always want it to follow a talk show format?
PFT: It’s based on Meet the Press. It’s the Sunday morning news shows. It’s the self-importance of these shows. A thing that kills me, in the old days of Meet the Press it would be one senator and four reporters and now it’s four senators, one reporter, then the senators go away and the reporter talks with other reporters about what just happened. In terms of accountability and holding people’s feet to the fire and everything, they’ve just given up. It’s just the idea of really challenging these people who are in positions of power because you don’t want to offend them because then they won’t come onto your show and then you won’t get ratings so Meet the Press is now this thing where people go on, they say their talking points, and then they’re excused, and then the reporters talk amongst themselves like “what do you think about what they said”—“I don’t know because before they said this other thing.”
I feel like the typical Meet the Press follow-up question is “now, really?” and the senator will say “yes really” and they say “well okay, I’ve done due diligence on that point.” The idea is they’re getting them on the record and then you can decide and do the research yourself. David Gregory said that at one point: the viewers are welcome to do their own research. And it’s like, what do we have you for? The average viewer isn’t supposed to say, “I wonder if he is on the record as saying something else somewhere, I better go look it up.” We like to, on our show, just make fun of the idea of the news media itself at any turn we can and point out the absurdity especially with having literal puppets on our show. We try to make it as silly as possible.
Paste: There’s definitely a social message you want to convey—we should be more distrusting of the media and the media should be more distrusting of the people they’re promoting.
PFT: We deserve a better media. It’s this wide open world now where literally anybody can be a reporter and you can go anywhere with your camera phone and go to a press conference or find a rally and shout a question at a politician… that’s not the same as having trained reporters allowed to ask tough questions without fear of reprisal from government agencies saying “well you don’t have access to this person anymore.” That’s horrible. You’re right around the corner from an actual honest-to-God Big Brother state at that point, you know? And that’s a thing we need to be aware of and talking about all the time.
Paste: How did Fusion feel when you brought the idea to them?
PFT: I was hired after the idea was already in place. It was David Javerbaum who was a producer on The Daily Show for many years who pitched this idea to Fusion and then asked me to be the host and they were on board. The network has been great in wanting to do different things, strange things, and letting us do whatever we want. They’ve been incredibly supportive of this show and our ideas and I think they recognize that they were a new outlet in a very saturated media market and internet landscape. It’s hard to find stuff, you know what I mean? There’s so much out there, there’s so much competition, that I think they recognized early on, “well we got to entertain ideas that seem crazy and give them room to grow.” It was a huge shot in the arm for us when we went from a fifteen minute show to a half hour show, when we kept getting picked up—that kind of faith from a network is very hard to come by and it’s huge for us.