Review: Getting High with Warhol
Photo via Getty/Sion Touhig/Staff
Even if you’ve never seen an Andy Warhol original, you’re probably familiar with his major works. Warhol’s well-known screenprints of Campbell’s Soup Cans (1962), the Marilyn Diptych (1962) and Chairman Mao portraits (1972) continue to draw admiration and curiosity with their bright colors and mesmerizing repetition. His life-long exploration of the relationship between celebrities, capitalism and the art world arguable set the foundation for contemporary art markets and Neo-Dada. Unlike artists such as Jeff Koons, Warhol was sometimes serious, mostly ironic and always mysterious. It was, and still is, hard to say what the artist actually believed in.
Andy Warhol: Prints from the Collections of Jordan D. Schnitzer and His Family Foundation at the High Museum in Atlanta, Georgia, offers an impressive look at Warhol’s accomplishments, with over 250 works spanning four decades. A lot of what the High showcases is what we would expect—a wall of Campbell’s soup cans, a woozy wall of Marilyns, the usual. The High purposefully keeps the accreditation vague. Any exhibit involving Warhol is likely to avoid the question of who actually created the prints, seeing as much of Warhol’s work made at his New York studio (The Factory), may have been created by friends or assistants. True to his ideology, Warhol wasn’t always the best at signing his work, preferring to create as a machine would create. This leads the High to print captions like the one below, which accompanied the wall of Campbell’s soup cans.
Andy Warhol (American, 1928-1987), Campbell’s Soup I: Tomato (II.46), AP edition E/Z, 1968, screenprint, 35 × 23 inches, courtesy of Jordan D. Schnitzer and His Family Foundation. © 2017 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.
These prints and those on the opposite wall are based on paintings of Campbell’s soup cans that Warhol exhibited in 1962 at the Ferus Gallery in Los Angeles, an exhibition that hastened a radical break with the past.
Great—so is it an original Warhol or not? Is there such a thing as an “original” Warhol? This is a dialogue the High could have engaged in, and chose not to. While the major Warhol works are eye-catching crowd-pleasers (particularly a wild wall of psychedelic Chairman Maos, set against a purple wallpaper of even more Chairman Maos), there was one section of the exhibition that was completely unexpected, charming and, well, cute.