Hacking ModCloth: A Look Behind the Online Powerhouse

Design Features

In an age of endless options and an infinite stream of consumer buying power, clothing is something that offers the most versatility, but finding a budget-friendly style that accompanies a clean conscience is tough. The latest plague sweeping the planet has found its roots in fast fashion, where the manufacturer of a 20-dollar dress is literally paid pennies to deliver high-quantity/low-quality in-demand pieces. In essence, staying style-conscious without breaking the bank and maintaining ethical responsibility has become a lost art. The Rana Plaza garment-factory building collapsing in Bangladesh 2 years ago was a wake-up call, but the lengths we have to trek in order to don inexpensive clothing that isn’t risking the lives of factory workers is becoming an all-too-literal life or death situation. Though the options for affordable, on-trend garments are nice, the ethical concern to this global demand begs the question: what exactly is our responsibility as fashion admirers?

Once upon a time, people would get their clothing from department stores, which received its inventory from manufacturers. Fast forward to 2015 and retailers are manufacturing clothing themselves, giving them direct control over the manufacturing and distribution process from start to finish. This has opened the door to fast fashion giants such as H&M, Forever 21 and Zara. A relentless thirst for trend-centric, new and fast products characterized the industry, backed by broke fashion students from Boca to Bangkok.


Powerhouses like H&M have become so fast, they can design, manufacture and get clothing into stores in under a month, and, with the e-commerce explosion, can now access up-to-the-minute arrivals for various brands online. In turn, we have become conditioned to expect a constant flow of options and styles at the click of a button. Don’t get me wrong, it’s beautiful to see kids without a constant cash flow be able to access new levels of style, but the trajectory of making that accessible is damaging to not just our spending habits, but any remaining attempt at regaining authenticity and integrity in fashion. Though fast fashion empires such as Forever 21 know they sell stolen designs and patterns in the form of wearable cheaply-produced textiles, ModCloth is one company that attempts to take a different track on the fashion express.

Upon recently perusing through ModCloth’s website, I found a slew of cute, on-trend and relatively unique pieces sourced from different designers and manufacturers all over the world. After a quick Google search on some of the brands, it’s easy to see that the vast majority of ModCloth’s inventory is from a wholesale factory, occasionally marked up once it reaches ModCloth territory, but sometimes, surprisingly discounted. ModCloth’s modus operandi is to aggregate an endless stream of unique manufacturers and sell it to you in a curated online boutique format, omitting any doubts as to whether or not your sequin ensemble was sewn together by a 7-year-old. Though it’s not entirely clear whether they are propelling the unjust factory-worker agenda for profit, its multi-million competitors such as H&M seem to forego any ethical concern while pushing inflated products before strategically selling each piece to you, the consumer, on a polyester platter while keeping their brand, and audience, in control. In exchange for our vapid quest towards being “on trend” (whatever that means today), these “democratized” clothiers are making bank producing cheap clothing for the girls of the modern world that are crazy enough to spend $84 on a pleather bibb.


However, if we get to the meat of these brands and their transparent standing in the fashion world, they are simply middle-man suppliers. The fact of the matter is that even mid-to-high-end clothing brands source from similar distributors. Simply put, the brand is what you’re paying for. And that comes as no surprise. You can purchase an Alexander Wang t-shirt for $140 or go across the street to H&M and pay $120 less. It’s the basic understanding of our label-obsessed society. Same print, same fabric, same cut, just a different label and price tag. A business practice the true American way.

Unfortunately, the presiding misconception with an alternative to fast fashion is spending thousands on quality, ethically-produced pieces, but there are various avenues that allow for the conscious consumer to still dress to the nines without breaking the bank. Educate yourself, buy local, buy less, buy used and buy from independent designers.


Perspective: the average American disposes over 68 pounds of textiles every year. These are 68 pounds that are not donated to charity or sold to consignment stores, but directly going into landfills. Since most of our clothing is manufactured with synthetic, petroleum-based fibers, it will take decades for these materials to decompose.

Until we quit fueling brands that operate on a business model of low quality/high volume, our supply and demand model will not change. But this needs to before we plummet head-first into a future that focuses its lost attention on a dystopian desert of excess and hoarding, desperately trying to fill the void that is so begging to be addressed by anything other than a knock-off Philip Lim dress. We need to address the bigger problems rooted within our collective conscious before the things we own end up owning us.


ModCloth’s business practices may be in question at times, but, at the very least, they are attempting to break the mold of what their fast fashion comrades have been circulating since the boom of e-commerce by bringing a platform of smaller, independent designers to the forefront of a capitalist delusion. Bring back authenticity, bring back ethics, dispel the bad juju and maybe all is not lost to the money-grubbing bottom line that fashion has become.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share Tweet Submit Pin