Scent of a Woman Opened a Gateway to a More Stylized Al Pacino 30 Years Ago

In 1992, Al Pacino was riding high. Pacino had been resurgent since the 1989 hit Sea of Love following a disappointing run that lasted much of the 1980s, but the fall of ’92 must have felt particularly triumphant, with an acclaimed supporting turn in the film version of Glengarry Glen Ross, followed by the December release of his star vehicle Scent of a Woman. Further validation arrived over the next few months, as he received Oscar nominations for both movies (his seventh and eighth overall), then won Best Actor for Scent.
At the time, it was hard to find anyone claiming that Scent of a Woman represented Pacino’s absolute top-tier work (though Roger Ebert did, in fact, call it “one of his best and riskiest performances”)—and, moreover, equally difficult to find many willing to deny that, 20 years and many classics after his first nomination for The Godfather, the man was due. Like so many Oscar winners, particularly of the ’90s, a sour aftertaste developed over the years that followed. And it didn’t take the full three decades since Scent of a Woman to formulate the idea that it represented a turning point for Pacino, surely not for the better.
Though 1992 does indeed feel like a inflection point in Pacino’s career, it may not be for the precise reason often suggested: That Scent of a Woman was a point of no return for the actor’s hammiest, most self-consciously showboating tendencies, which he wasn’t able to shake for years or really ever, depending on who you ask. It’s a tempting line to draw, especially given that Pacino could have easily won Best Supporting Actor for an equally magnetic, far quieter and, yes, probably better performance in Glengarry Glen Ross. The Academy chose big and so, in the following years, did Pacino.
Yet, revisiting Scent of a Woman today, it’s striking how much of it plays in a quieter register than its reputation. Yes, Pacino’s Lt. Col. Frank Slade makes a catchphrase out of his exclamations of a military-style “hoo-ah!” especially as the movie goes on. And yes, there is a ridiculous faux-courtroom finale full of grandstanding that directly recalls Pacino’s sweaty legal drama …And Justice For All, with Slade hollering “I’ll show you out of order!” in Scent subbing in for the “You’re out of order! The whole trial is out of order!” moment from Justice, a pilfering so shameless that it feels less like homage than sloppy misquote (appropriate, given how much more famous that line is than anything else in the earlier film). The Oscars clipped from this scene, right on cue.
At the same time, not all of Pacino’s performance goes to this level—a lot of the movie’s show-offy, vaguely insufferable qualities come from the writing, rather than the acting. Pacino delivers much of his dialogue in a rhythmic growl, rather than a roar, making Slade a lazy, self-impressed poet breaking all his lines in the same places. (Was John Goodman consciously parodying this speaking style in Inside Llewyn Davis, or does it just come naturally when playing a man more interested in imparting his opinions than empathizing with others?) To be sure, it’s a different tempo from Pacino’s standout scene in Glengarry, where his Ricky Roma philosophizes/bullshits to a prospective client (Jonathan Pryce). (He also looks, and seems to be playing, 10 to 15 years older in Scent, an old man before his time.) But there’s a similar calculation visible as both character and actor craft their messages for their audience. With Roma, there’s never doubt that the customer is his audience. With Slade, it’s harder to tell; his primary audience, at least in the early stretch of the movie, may be himself.