Bethlehem

Bethlehem wants to be a lot of things. It wants to be a psychological thriller. It wants to be a political epic. It wants to be a complex examination of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It doesn’t quite accomplish any of these aspirations.
Bethlehem is the first feature by Yuval Adler. Adler is Israeli and Jewish. He wrote the screen play with Ali Wakak, a Palestinian journalist. The movie chronicles the relationship between Razi (Tsahi Halevi) and Sanfur (Shadi Mar’i). Razi is a member of Israeli’s intelligence agency. Sanfur is one of Razi’s informants and the younger brother of Ibrahim, a charismatic militant leader who has successfully executed a series of suicide bombings and pledges continued aggression.
Nominally, the film is about betrayal. Sanfur has begun informing on his brother, but when he transfers money to Hamas under Razi’s nose, his loyalty is questioned. Razi and Sanfur have a paternal relationship, and the film clearly wants to examine the moral ambiguity inherent in Sanfur’s divided loyalties. The Holy Land seems an ideal choice for this sort of conundrum. After all, was not Israel home to one of the greatest betrayals in written history—that of Judas and Christ?
The problem with Alder’s narrative is his political bias. It’s obvious that Adler views Razi as the hero of the film and Israel as the ultimate victim in the conflict.
While Sanfur is forced to choose between his real family and his quasi father, Razi’s loyalty is never questioned. This isn’t because Razi is a fanatic Zionist (this might have been more interesting), but because Razi’s cause is portrayed as more just than Sanfur’s. Razi is trying to prevent violence whereas Ibrahim and his ilk are depicted as the sole perpetrators of it.