Miss Sloane

Miss Sloane plays out like a very long episode of a very boring TV drama—though its odd narrative time hops are seemingly the only aspect that differentiates its gun-control-legislation-pushing plot from anything you’d flip past on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Director John Madden (Shakespeare in Love and both Exotic Marigold Hotels, first and second-best) has made some vivid films, full of life and energy, despite their unassuming subjects. He does his best with the dry material here, but—like in the case of most dramas indulging in crosses and double-crosses—it’s the script that fails him.
Screenwriting teachers often encourage their students to read scripts by writers they respect who’ve written movies they aspire to create, which makes sense: Moviemakers watch movies, novelists read novels and screenwriters should read scripts. The downside of this training is that when a particular voice is successful in any of these mediums, capitalism and a rote approach to success lead to a deluge of copycats. In screenwriting, Aaron Sorkin is possibly the most famous voice in the business, so it’s no surprise that Miss Sloane’s fast-talking government patter sounds like a weak echo from a more established writer. This is Jonathan Perera’s very first script (not produced—it’s the first he’s ever written) and he’s proud to let you know he’s the only writer who touched the thing between his query letter regarding potential representation and greenlit production. Perera writes like he’s never done this before.
Miss Sloane’s pace often races toward that banter-y headrush familiar to those who’ve been inundated by the walk-and-talk takeover of the aforementioned Sorkin dramas, but it’s cleansed of the acid that makes Sorkin’s work clever enough to sit through. Conversations between the film’s plethora of patsies and the lobbyist demigod Sloane (Jessica Chastain) are about palm oil taxes, Senate loopholes and form filing. Topics of varying glamor are approached with the same whipcrack speed and shit-eating grin no matter their import, leaving the audience beaten down by both the meaningless political jargon and its monotonous delivery. The film tries to replicate, over and over, a tense series of searing verbal ping pong volleys, but it serves up one overripe grape after another. Lines just splat on the floor.