The Hollars

Don’t think of John Krasinski’s new film, The Hollars, as an example of actorly vanity or celebrity self-indulgence. Think of it simply as a bad film. It’s fashionable to greet projects either written or directed by screen performers sans mercy, and to critique them as evidence of ego, but all art is ego-driven, so you’re better off kvetching about rain being wet. In the case of The Hollars, rain is caustic, too, but also harmless, as most quirky indie comedies sent down the conveyor belt at the quirky indie comedy manufacturing plant tend to be. Krasinski’s film irritates the soul as sulfates irritate the skin—though we should at least should get some honest blistering out of it.
That’s the problem with The Hollars: It’s disingenuous. None of its parts feel authentic or even remotely original. Dysfunctional families have been a popular fixture in film since Julien Duvivier made Poil de carotte in 1925, though there’s perhaps an argument to be made that we’re more attached to maladjusted households on the big screen today than we have ever been. If so, and if Krasinski made The Hollars to tangle with unspoken familial issues of his own, then we’re led to wonder which parts of the film highlight those experiences, and which he came up with just to satisfy the faux-acidity quotient expected in any movie that deals with terminal illness, failed parental bonds, pregnancy scares, economical woe, teenage nostalgia and wound up siblings.
When Krasinski’s character, John, leaves his Big New York City Life™ and returns to his home in small town America, he runs into all contretemps listed above. John’s mother, Sally (Margo Martindale), has been diagnosed with a brain tumor, while the family business is failing. Sally’s troubles don’t beget new troubles for her clan so much as they drags old ones to the surface, where they bob along like domestic detritus. Because John has his life together, at least compared to the rest of his kin, and because he’s a metropolitan type and thus, per screenwriting convention, more capable of rational thought than his less evolved relatives and neighbors, it falls to him to hold the family together.
Garden State, meet Me and Earl and the Dying Girl. The former is the first, most obvious connective reference anyone might make about The Hollars’ ancestry as cinema, though hardly the only one worth making. The Hollars, as a family, call to mind the Tenenbaums, the Griswolds, the Weston-Fordhams and the Hoovers, among others, but they fall on the “wacky” side of dysfunction instead of the “abusive.” Royal Tenenbaum is the kind of person who would spill his soup at a party. John’s dad, Don (Richard Jenkins), is the guy whose lap the soup would fall in. As Sally learns of her delicate mortality, Don comes undone. It helps not at all that his other son, John’s older brother Ron (Sharlto Copley), is a fuck-up, a man divorced from his wife along with all markings of civility. Bar him from the toilet and he’ll piss in the kitchen instead.