The Theory of Everything

In The Theory of Everything, English thesps Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones play out an arc made from the stuff of fairly boilerplate romantic comedy tropes. They have their meet-cute; they flirt; they fall head over heels for each other; when tragedy strikes, they commit to stick together through thick and thin, at least until things grow too thick to bear and they must painfully part ways. But then, by the time the film comes to a close, they’re reunited in a fashion, and we breathe a sigh of relief. Normalcy is more or less restored!
Only, Redmayne and Jones aren’t portraying normal people leading normal existences. They are instead portraying Stephen Hawking and Jane Wilde, he one of the world’s greatest scientific minds, she his long suffering but deeply compassionate and empathetic wife. The Theory of Everything is the story of the life they lived together, from their first encounters in 1960s Cambridge, to their years spent enduring Hawking’s battle with Lou Gehrig’s Disease, to their current situation of amicable separation. The film so handsomely commemorates Hawking’s contributions to his field along the way that one could be forgiven for mistakenly assuming that the stage belongs to Redmayne alone, but he shares it quite happily with Jones. In point of fact, the picture accords them both richly deserved individual attention rather than focus foremost on its leading man.
The Theory of Everything is directed by James Marsh, a filmmaker perhaps best known for his 2008 super-stylized documentary effort, Man On Wire. Here, Marsh doesn’t simply document his central subject as much as he makes an embellished chronicle of Hawking’s extraordinary career achievements. Admirably, he does so with unexpected restraint and propriety—after all, movies like this tend more toward melodrama. The Theory of Everything, in fairness, does seem to, on paper, sound an awful lot like your standard “struggling genius” pictures, and in many ways it looks like one too. The picture milks adversity, quietly at first and then more loudly as the plot pleasantly idles forward. It’s a strategy designed to wring maximum waterworks from an emotionally vulnerable audience, and kudos to Marsh, because it genuinely succeeds.