House Republican up for Reelection Calls for an Assault Weapons Ban
Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty
Don’t ever let anyone tell you that you have no power to change politics in America. Within less than two weeks of yet another mass casualty event, the students of Stoneman Douglas High School have pushed Republican Senator Marco Rubio to the left on gun legislation, spurred massive companies like Chubb and Hertz to abandon the NRA, coordinated a march on Washington, and pressured the President of the United States to call for a ban on bump stocks.
Now, Brian Mast, Republican Representative of Florida’s 18th Congressional District, has gone a step further: calling for a ban on assault weapons in an op-ed in today’s New York Times, titled “I Appreciate Assault Weapons. And I Support a Ban.”
This isn’t some mealy-mouthed article where he tries to find “common ground” with a bunch of empty platitudes. He specifically states what he supports.
Defining what constitutes an assault or tactical firearm and not allowing them for future purchase — just as we already prohibit the purchase of fully automatic firearms. The exact definition of assault weapon will need to be determined. But we should all be able to agree that the civilian version of the very deadly weapon that the Army issued to me should certainly qualify. I would not support any version of a ban that results in confiscating existing legally owned firearms.