The 8 Most Childish Moments in Supergirl, “City of Lost Children”
(Episode 2.20)
Bettina Strauss/The CW
I may once or twice have been accused of reading too much into the titles of television episodes. (Mostly by myself—I accuse myself.) So, “City of Lost Children” may have been more than a little misleading for me.
In case you aren’t overly familiar with ’90s French cinema—and honestly, if you aren’t, you probably had a way more productive ’90s than I did—Marc Caro and Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s La Cité des Enfants Perdus is a science-fiction dystopian classic. Released in the Untied State as The City of Lost Children, it deals with an evil being who is aging prematurely because he lacks the ability to dream. To combat this, he takes to kidnapping children from a French seaside town, imprisons them in his offshore oil rig/lair, and through the use of some very suspect science, extracts their dreams.
He gets away with this for a long time. In fact, he’s so successful that almost no children are left in the city by the beginning of the film. I don’t want to spoil too much of the plot here, as the movie is phenomenal. It’s dark and weird in all the right ways, and the best on-camera interpretation of “realistic” steampunk I can name. Also, the hero is a French-speaking Ron Pearlman. His character, a strongman named One, is desperately trying to track down his recently kidnapped adopted brother. It’s a film I recommend to pretty much anyone willing to listen, but in the case of last night’s Supergirl, it put some ideas in my head that just weren’t going to be there.
I was expecting a plot line involving missing children. Possibly kidnapped alien children or accidently/purposefully transported to another planet/dimension/CW television show by Rhea’s experiment children. So imagine my confusion when, halfway through the episode, the only person missing is the mother of one very adorable alien boy. Frustrating, though I had to wonder what they were getting at with this title.
Ah, it occurred to me—perhaps they are playing with a reversal of my expectations. Perhaps the children in this episode aren’t lost themselves. Maybe they are “lost” because their parents will disappear. Clever. It didn’t happen. But clever.
I threw my hands up in frustration. Why choose such a provocative title, such a specific idea, if you aren’t going to make use of it? Do television shows do this just to annoy me? Should I assume that they just use phrases they think sound cool without any care for the implications those phrases have for the episode? And will someone please tell me why Lena has regressed into a giant quivering lip of mommy issues? I thought we were past this! I thought after everything with Mama Luthor she’d grown up! I thought—oh.
And then, gentle reader, I got it. The lost children aren’t children. Not in the physiological sense, anyway. So, here it is: the top eight childish moments, both subtle and not so subtle, in last night’s Supergirl.
1. The Cruelest Decision Since Sophie’s Choice: ’90s Kid Edition
Kara and Lena’s lunch date gives us our first moment of levity in what will turn out to be a pretty heavy episode overall. It should probably have been a hint that our characters weren’t going to be acting their most mature when conversation reverted to who’s actually responsible for holding up the big N’SYNC reunion we all know is just around the corner. And while Kara totally nails that one—obviously, it’s Justin—we descend even deeper into TigerBeat madness with one very simple question from Lena: Would you rather have an N’SYNC reunion or Justin and Britney back together again? No one should be forced to make that kind of choice, or be able to wield that kind of power.
2. Lena’s Mommy Issues
So, the “lost children” of the title are none other than our cast of heroes. Mon-El, Kara, and Winn all have their moments, but the brunt of this idea seems to rest on James and Lena. We’ll come back to James in a bit, but Lena’s need for a mentor is bordering on the unhealthy from the very start tonight.