The Capture Provides a Brief, Terrifying View at the Future of State Surveillance

In The Capture, Holliday Grainger’s DI Rachel Carey believes she has an open and shut case regarding an assault and kidnapping captured on CCTV. The perpetrator’s face—Lance Corporal Shaun Emery (Callum Turner)—is clearly shown and easily identified, leading to his quick apprehension. But was it him? It’s not just that he’s confused about this crime he has supposedly committed that he has no memory of (and in fact, has a conflicting memory about), it’s that it also comes on the heels of an overturned conviction based on de-synced audio and video evidence, suggesting how easily manipulated that kind of evidence can be.

A smart and twisty thriller written and directed by Ben Chanan (and imbued with a cozy autumnal London aesthetic), The Capture leads Rachel down a path to question everything she sees—including live events that may be manipulated. The how and the why drive this captivating 6-episode season (which the BBC has already renewed), introducing us, via Rachel, to the technique of “correction methods,” which sounds an awful lot like pre-crime from Minority Report.

While there is a certain sci-fi element to where the series ends up, it’s not out of the realm of possibility now or in the far future. Deep fake exists, as well as facial recognition software and increasing camera surveillance everywhere. We carry a lot of it around with us in our pockets with our phones, but The Capture doesn’t get into the tech side so much as it wants to explore the moral quandary of exploiting its general potential. With doctored footage, redacted frames, the exploitation of blindspots and more, it feels like the stuff of conspiracy. But when a character describes their methods of doctoring footage as “not fake evidence, it’s truth reenacted,” there is a chilling reality to it.

In many ways, these ideas pair perfectly with the idea of visual literacy and the question of how we will remember our current cultural moment. It was on my mind after arguing with a family member about protestors wearing masks; the news footage she saw showed protestors not wearing masks, the news footage I saw only showed protestors with masks. Which was true? Undoubtedly both images were real, but cherry-picked to appeal to and support partisan views. Which will we remember? Which version will be shown to us in the future? It’s not much of a leap to believe the next step is not just showing curated images, but creating them.