Published Fanfiction is Part of Literary History (For Better or Worse)

I get a lot of emails from book publicists hoping to draw attention to their upcoming releases. This is a common part of the business, a way of getting eyeballs on a project in a market that is increasingly oversaturated and dependent on online buzz. I’m used to getting hype-heavy statements and promises that this title here is definitely the next big thing. What has become increasingly common, unexpectedly so, are the sheer number of publicity calls I get for books that were, once upon a time, fanfiction. These details aren’t hidden either. It was previously considered unthinkable to turn one’s fanfic into “original” work for traditional publication, let alone have it be a selling point for the masses. Now, it’s the norm. Published fanfiction is our literary future, but it’s also long been embedded in the medium’s past.
First, let’s get pedantic. Fanfiction is defined as a piece created by fans that is unauthorized but based on an existing work of fiction. The foundations of fanfic are rooted in pre-existing intellectual properties that are typically copyrighted. The writer can add original ideas, characters, and themes, but the basic narrative remains intrinsically tied to the material it’s based on. Copyright is a crucial part of what defines much of our understanding of fanfiction, although works that could very well be viewed as fanfic existed long before the adoption of such laws.
Shakespeare’s plays were often based on well-known stories, both recent and ancient. Many popular authors in the Victorian era saw their works pastiched and sequalized for the mainstream with and without their authorization. This happened all the time with Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes during his lifetime. Even his pal, Peter Pan writer J.M. Barrie, got in on the fun with a story called “The Late Sherlock Holmes.” Many great works in the literary canon could be added to the fanfic pile, whether it’s Wide Sargasso Sea’s anti-colonialist rewrite of the madwoman in the attic of Jane Eyre or Tom Stoppard’s cheeky existential dissection of Hamlet with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. And that doesn’t even cover the many stories that reimagine the lives of real people, living or dead.
T.S. Eliot once wrote, “Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal. Bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different.” One could easily extend this perspective to the entirety of the written word. We are a species of storytellers, and we’ve always reinvented what came before us for new generations. Whether or not you believe Christopher Booker’s assertion that there are only seven basic plots to all narratives and we just reuse them over and over again, it’s undeniable that we love to utilize the sturdy foundations of tried and true stories that have stood the test of time.
Jane Austen remains so popular because, while societal standards have greatly shifted since the Regency era, meddling families, battles of class, and the quest for love in the face of stifling conformity are ideas that have never stopped being relevant. The same goes for something like Sherlock Holmes because humans thrive on mysteries and the comforting closure of someone who can solve them. It’s no wonder Austen and Conan Doyle have had their works reinvented countless times over the decades. The fanfic-esque reinvention of, say, Pride and Prejudice, offers new points-of-view and challenges for writers. How does Lizzie and Darcy’s story change when the setting is moved to another country? What changes about their familial tensions when they are modern-day Muslims in Toronto? What about if the genders are swapped or it’s a same-gender romance? If the basic plot is good enough, you can do whatever you want with it, and there’s something magical about it. No wonder some of the most acclaimed writers on the planet have tried their hand at it, whether it’s Will Self’s reinvention of The Picture of Dorian Gray for the AIDS era or James Joyce’s Ulysses using The Odyssey as the basis for a wildly ambitious and stylistically malleable portrait of Dublin.
So, yes, this is all extremely fanficcy. There’s no denying it. But there is a difference between this and what followed, between playing around with the public domain and taking stories created in fandom spaces using major IPs into the mainstream as “original.” To get into that, we need to look at the modern concept of fandom.