Conclave Promises Sinful Entertainment But Trips Over its Own Vestments

The pope is dead, long live the pope. In the papal election thriller Conclave, the Holy Father has ascended, and a different ascendency now grips the Vatican: which member of the College of Cardinals, hastily assembled in the sealed Sistine Chapel (the word conclave comes from the Latin cum clave, “with a key”), will receive a supermajority vote to become supreme pontiff of the Catholic Church. The traditional, closed-door design of the election invites an inherent layer of mystery and conspiracy, and the staggered voting process – the tallies of each vote are announced in front of the cardinals, giving them a brief recess to reconsider who is worth throwing their weight behind before having another go – provides an attractive structure for drama.
Add an archbishop (Jacek Koman) breathlessly informing the conclave chief that one of the hopeful cardinals was dismissed by the pope just before he passed away, and the arrival of Benitez (Carlos Diehz), a Mexican cardinal on a secret, pope-approved mission in Kabul, and the sealed doors of the conclave become a pressure cooker for the Church’s future.
Cardinal Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes) is the dean of the College of Cardinals, and he’s going through it. Well, technically the whole Church is going through it, but prior to the death of the pontiff, Lawrence was struggling: a crisis of faith, vocational doubts, tension with the Holy Father. Fiennes lends Lawrence a shaky, mannered grace – as the conclave becomes a haven for all sorts of naïve, sly, and ambitious men, his clerical approach to managing the election as neutrally as possible becomes a creed of reason triumphing over hysteria. For Conclave’s more entertaining stretches, Lawrence is a sterling makeshift detective navigating the hushed asides and furtive glances in Vatican halls; as a protagonist, he is primed with enough inner conflict for us to gel with his perspective, but not enough to get in the way of an expository thriller.
There’s no getting around it, Conclave turns increasingly silly. When the sensory, oppressive tradition that hangs over the Church meshes with the unspoken hierarchies and fellowships that have formed among bishops, cardinals, and cloistered nuns, a heightened, eyebrow-arching mood is conjured. With every dismissive reference to the dubious holiness of these Men of God, you can’t help but grin and gasp at the theatrics of it all.
In adapting British historical and political novelist Thomas Harris’ book, director Edward Berger (All Quiet on the Western Front) opts for a drab, surgical visual style, which, in theory, complements the completely desanctified process at the center of the film. But although Berger and cinematographer Stéphane Fontaine’s clean, photography-like compositions hit that sweet spot of “deliberate and important” and “lacking any identifiable fingerprints” that feels increasingly necessary for an Oscar-courting thriller, Conclave lacks the invasive and subversive edge that someone like Jonathan Demme, who was a master at translating robust literary thrillers to coy, distressing cinema, would bring to the material.