The Menu Satirizes the Self-Sacrificing Working Class

The trailer for Ali G Indahouse and Succession director Mark Mylod’s fourth feature effort—the latest since 2011’s iconic (joking) Chris Evans vehicle What’s Your Number?—social satire The Menu did not inspire confidence. But I chalk it up to yet another case of a trailer doing a disservice to the finished piece (“fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, yadda yadda”). I always try to reserve judgment about these sorts of things. But I am, by nature, a judgmental, opinionated and reactive person. And the trailer’s cuts to “Well, that just happened!”-esque gags and a plot that seemed to evoke something as obvious as The Most Dangerous Game conjured in my mind another predictable “elevated” horror/thriller employing the same detached sense of post-ironic humor that has infiltrated and subsequently ruined a huge swath of modern films. I’m not pointing any fingers, but if you know, you know.
So, with slightly less-than-neutral expectations, I came out of The Menu pleasantly surprised—not just by the fact that I mostly enjoyed it, but by the tight, funny, unpredictable narrative which, in a way, was actually benefited by the red herring of a trailer. It’s true that The Menu is, as Fran Hoepfner describes it, “all empty calories.” With a plot outwardly carrying class satire and a takedown of foodie culture and elitism, written with the sharp, snappy dialogue given to the Roy family—the same sort of wealthy people who would undoubtedly visit a restaurant like Hawthorne, and that Mylod enjoys putting on blast—The Menu is sillier than it is successfully satirical. That’s not a bad thing, and it keeps the film light and airy as opposed to an overly dense mouthful. But the intertwining of commentary on the drudgery of working in customer service and the solidarity that is necessary between service workers intrigued me. As a former employee of Panera Bread, The Gap and Gap ancillaries Banana Republic and Old Navy for nearly a decade, I was an easy mark.
The Menu unfolds as such: Foodie enthusiast Tyler (Nicholas Hoult) brings his friend Margot (Anya Taylor-Joy) to a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity chance to dine at Hawthorne, a highly exclusive restaurant that operates out of a private island. There, they’ll be served by Tyler’s idol, the revered Chef Julian Slowik (Ralph Fiennes), along with a group of other dinner guests ranging from snobbish food critics to business playboys to old-money regulars. Over the course of the overwrought dinner (consisting of rocks, foam and “unaccompanied accompaniments”) we learn that Margot and Tyler are not really friends at all. Tyler is one of Margot’s clients, and Margot is an escort he decided to bring in place of the girlfriend who just dumped him. It’s the inclusion of Margot that knocks Slowik’s meticulous dinner plans out of orbit. Margot understands that there’s something not quite right about Hawthorne, and Slowik calculates that there’s something not quite right about Margot. He confronts Margot, urging her that she shouldn’t be here. The menu was not meant for her.
Eventually, we get what Slowik meant by this: He has astutely clocked that Margot is not one of the customers, but one of the staff. He sees through her thin façade: She is not of the upper crust, but a servant of them just like he is. Still, her inclusion in the evening cannot free her of her impending fate, which is the death of all diners, all cooks and Slowik himself. It’s part of Slowik’s ambitious new menu, a means of transcending the confines of mere culinary artistry (“Everybody dying is part of the menu!”). It’s a cheeky way to make fun of the culture of high-class cuisine; of beautifully composed dishes that aren’t actually for eating, and the people who eagerly pay for them. It’s then revealed that Tyler happily knew about everyone dying before coming to Hawthorne, and that he swapped his girlfriend out not because she dumped him, but because he didn’t want her to die. Instead, he brought a sex worker.