The Supremes at Earls All-You-Can-Eat Is All Ingredients, No Cooking

An “all-you-can-eat” diner is supposed to be the epitome of comfort, a rest stop where you can fill up before rejoining the hustle and bustle of modern life. A great diner knows its strengths and keeps them coming, but some bloat themselves with too many ideas. Tina Mabry’s new film The Supremes at Earl’s All-You-Can-Eat plays like a Golden Corral that’s begun to tarnish with an overstuffed menu of narrative choices, none of which arrive fully cooked.
Based on Edward Kelsey Moore’s 2013 novel, the film follows three friends, Odette (Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor), Clarice (Uzo Aduba) and Barbara Jean (Sanaa Lathan), from the early 1950s through the late 1990s as they share their lives together. Nicknamed “The Supremes” by Big Earl (Tony Winters), endearing owner of the titular all-you-can-eat spot, the girls gather at their regular booth to gossip, find love, mourn loss and support each other.
With three lives and 40 years to fill, Mabry and co-writer Cee Marcellus throw every predictable plot point into the pan and pray for the best. There’s abuse, alcoholism, adultery and cancer, with racial violence and interracial romance on top. The trouble is that the film lacks a lyrical symmetry to bind it all together. It all comes out like a loose, melodramatic meatloaf. Heightened emotional beats arrive seemingly out of nowhere with no development or resolve. It’s as if the events of the plot are supposed to provide gravity just because they happen. But plot does not impart flavor on its own. It must be earned and enriched with time spent simmering with the repercussions. Things happen too quickly, and they don’t seem to matter. The motifs of friendship, life/death and destiny/fate aren’t rendered with enough symbolism or meaning to stir the genuine emotional reaction a story like this wants to achieve. Instead, Mabry and Marcellus give the film an easily digestible sheen that keeps the story feeling superficial.
It leaves a sour taste to see such well-seasoned actresses smothered in cheese. You can see their talents being neglected, and these women deserve more. They are under-served by a script that tries to fold weighted prose into a shallow trajectory. For all the sopping emotional dialogue, Mabry and Marcellus give little time to let it bake in before moving on to the next poignant moment. We follow no tangible arc. The film is made up mostly of moments, bites of something juicy but not enough to satisfy. Watching these actresses work, you can tell how much they make out of so little. Someone get these women a Broadway show! They have the chemistry and chops to conquer complex material individually and as an ensemble.