The Best Way to Look Back at Pretty Baby Is through Brooke Shields’ College Thesis

Brooke Shields stops her Princeton senior thesis on Louis Malle to let us know that, for all the beauty in the dramatic haze that pervades Pretty Baby, “in actuality, the substance has a rich and inescapable incense smell that spreads throughout all areas and permeates all materials.” It’s a rare sense memory in an otherwise astute academic analysis, and it reminds us that Shields is far more an expert than she lets on. Her thesis, with the appropriately jargoned title The Initiation: From Innocence to Experience: The Pre-Adolescent / Adolescent Journey in the films of Louis Malle, Pretty Baby and Lacombe Lucien, is a fascinating addendum not only to Pretty Baby but also “The Sex Wars” of the late-1970s.
Colloquially considered to mark the end of second-wave feminism and the fomenting of the third, “The Sex Wars” were clashes fueled by economic deregulation, deindustrialization, a thinning social safety net, and increased gender and racial visibility and activism. Feminists divided themselves on the issue of pornography, many believing it to be a tool of pure patriarchy and exploitation, while others argued that sexually liberated pornography was possible. These debates over the production and public exhibition of pornography—which was significantly more accessible in the 1970s—were deeply wedded to the freedom of speech provided in the American constitution, which justified works against creative obscenity laws to judge their moral usefulness and legality. Into this fray, in 1978, the year between Anita Bryant forming the Save Our Children Campaign and Jerry Falwell fashioning The Moral Majority, came Louis Malle’s story about a child sex worker in turn-of-the-20th-century America, Pretty Baby.
Set in 1917 Storyville, the historic New Orleans red light district, the film follows Violet (Shields), a bright and precocious 12-year-old entering adulthood while growing up in a brothel with her mother, Hattie (Susan Sarandon). When a shy cameraman named Bellocq (Keith Carradine) starts coming around to photograph the girls, she forms a curious attachment, and eventually, something blossoms between the two. Bellocq marries Violet, and she lives a semi-contented life as his child-wife until her mother’s fateful return beckons her into a new age.
In her 1987 thesis, Shields describes Violet as living through “the termination of a certain period” in American history. In the early 1900s, laws around so-called sexual “vices” were more lax, and children moved from childhood to adulthood with no stage in the middle. New moral and labor regulations meant Violet was part of the last generation who wouldn’t have an “adolescence.” That would be for her children to enjoy. Her grandchildren would be the first “teenagers.” But she, more than most girls at the time, entered adulthood in a precarious and ambiguous arena of morality.
Brooke’s paper is fascinated by this murky cinematic journey into what we now call adolescence, which she sees as a theme across Malle’s oeuvre. It’s a well-thought-out, sometimes even poetic argument for reading Malle as a cinematic auteur who “creates a panoramic view of a situation that enables the spectator to reach his own conclusions,” not as a provocateur but as an artist exploring rites of passage throughout his work and career.
With its citations ranging from Flaubert, Jung, Piaget and Proust, The Initiation reads, first and foremost, like a requirement for a bachelor of arts degree in French literature from the 1980s. And we should read it as such. Doing so allows you to see the remarkable objectivity with which Shields approaches cinema and her own work. Her argument is structured very matter-of-factly with claims and evidence. She brings a strong technical understanding of film from her extensive career in front of the camera to accurately describe what is functioning visually, which is quite remarkable. Even more bold is when Brooke enters the page. Though she only does it a few times in the commendable 127 pages, it’s still somewhat unusual. Conventional humanities papers rarely encourage the use of the first person—certainly not in Ivy League literary criticism. Yet Shields can’t help but add a little documentary feel, just like the director who inspired her thesis.
The first time Brooke appears in her thesis is in a section discussing Malle’s methods, inspired by his years of documentary filmmaking. Like many European New Wave filmmakers, Malle preferred a less staged, more organic approach to filming, which made his films more “textured,” according to Shields. One of the ways Malle encouraged this organic “spontaneity” is through the use of non-professional actors and a linear shooting style. In her experience, Malle’s methods are helpful and produce good results. She writes,
“I was a non-professional and had no formal acting training. I only knew what my instincts told me…I had no armor to break through and, as a result, Louis Malle let me proceed naturally, printing only what he felt was necessary.”
Filming the narrative in chronological order allowed her to retain a logical progression in her mind. She remembers “beginning with the first scene of the movie on the first day of filming and ending with the last sequence during the last week of filming.” This unimpeded march through time allowed Brooke and Violet to age simultaneously. She adds:
“Malle said there was a certain evolution in my appearance and attitude that was common to both my character and Violet’s. This evolution was documented and used as a salient part of the film. It made Violet’s character more believable and helped maintain the film’s pace.”
For just a moment, Brooke has dropped the mask. The character of Violet she’ll be addressing throughout her thesis is more than a character in a Louis Malle film. Violet is also a character she created. Violet was and remains a piece of work for Shields, which she can step back to appreciate and analyze.