The Queerness of Harvey, 70 years later

Harvey is officially 70 years old, meaning that anyone born the year it came out (1950) has qualified for social security benefits for a solid eight years now. Though the movie does feel its age, it’s still a great watch. Jimmy Stewart is winning as the kindhearted Elwood P. Dowd, the writing is lush and pointed and the whole movie hums with a kind of open-hearted earnestness that is nowadays mostly relegated to holiday films. It’s this earnestness that makes the movie work. Even now, Harvey is probably one of the most successful films to tackle the problems that normalization poses towards anyone that society deems abnormal. Because of this, it also serves as a perfect metaphor for queer experience and how society treats non-traditional and undefinable behavior as inherently dangerous.
For those who are not familiar with the film, Elwood P. Dowd is a fairly eccentric wealthy man whose best friend is a very tall invisible rabbit named Harvey. It’s in the existence of Harvey and Elwood’s friendship where the story’s conflict lies.
Even before we meet Elwood, we hear his sister Veta (Josephine Hull) and niece Myrtle Mae (Victoria Horne) lament that he’s ruining their lives. They live with Elwood, as Elwood owns the house and has all the money, and his strangeness has frightened away all of their friends. Veta is attempting to throw a party for Myrtle Mae to meet influential women who can introduce her to their eligible male relatives, but before the party starts, the caterer Miss Johnson storms out. Apparently, she has met Elwood (off screen) and asks the women, “Do you think I’d stay in this house after that?”
The “that” that Miss Johnson is referring to is presumed to be the scandalous behavior of Elwood introducing her to the unseen and unheard Harvey. The response to Elwood’s odd behavior seems a bit overblown, which is kind of a statement in itself. Though Elwood’s behavior is strange, nothing else about him is at all frightening or dangerous. In fact, he’s always the perfect gentleman. And yet, the language Miss Johnson uses condemns, as if it’s improper to be around anyone who acknowledges something that others can’t see or don’t understand.
At the party, Elwood introduces guests to Harvey, which clears the room of any partygoers fairly quickly. This seems to be the final straw, as Veta and Myrtle Mae come to the conclusion that there’s nothing left to do but to send Elwood to a sanatorium. During this process, there’s a mix up: The doctors and nurses cart Veta away instead of Elwood. It’s a comedic sequence, as the doctor preens himself on his clever handling of the “sane” Elwood and the “not sane” Veta.
There’s definitely a statement being made on how people define sanity, but these scenes also work to highlight the differences between Veta and Elwood. Veta is angry and combative (to be fair, she’s been driven to frustration from years of Harvey) while Elwood, on the other hand, is docile and happy to go anywhere with anyone. In this case, Veta and Elwood are measured by their behavior and their temperaments….that is, until the doctor realizes that it’s Elwood who sees an invisible rabbit. Then Elwood once more becomes a threat who must be tracked down.
What causes this initial confusion is that, in a moment of frustration, Veta reveals to the doctor that she has been so broken down that even she sometimes sees Harvey. Veta’s ability to see Harvey adds a new dimension to the story, as it puts her in the same position as Elwood—though she refuses to acknowledge Harvey, because it isn’t what one does.
When Elwood is tracked down, the doctor wants to give him a formula which will cure Elwood of his affliction. There’s an obvious reading here in which this treatment represents conversion therapy, but sidestepping that one-to-one comparison, the formula more broadly represents taking away a central part of who Elwood is and who Elwood enjoys being.